• Hi Guest. Welcome to the new forums. All of your posts and personal messages have been migrated. Attachments (i.e. images) and The (Old) Classifieds have been wiped.

    The old forums will be available for a couple of weeks should you wish to grab old images or classifieds listings content. Go Here

    If you have any issues please post about them in the Forum Feedback thread: Go Here

Are co2 guns classed as airguns?

Spoon, the lower energy limit for a projectile firing item to be considered a firearm (capable of firing a projectile with sufficient muzzle energy to cause more than trivial injury) came from a report of a meeting of the home office select committee in 2000, as I stated above.
Arrr i seee, i take it that you are refaring to :-

26. The Home Office and the Forensic Science Service considers that the lowest level of muzzle energy capable of inflicting a penetrating wound is one foot pound (or about 1.35 joules): below these power levels, weapons are "incapable of penetrating even vulnerable parts of the body, such as the eye".[54] However, more recent analysis by the Forensic Science Agency for Northern Ireland has indicated that a more reasonable assessment of the minimum muzzle energy required to inflict a penetrating wound lies between 2.2 and 3.0 ft/lb (3-4 J).[55] We will deal more fully with this discrepancy at paragraphs 123 to 130 below.
Am i right in saying that these are only recommendations at the minute (i may be wrong), but they could be formed into legal basis. Very handy information :) , and i would like to see them implemented, as current law is very very broad, and needs updating slightly ;)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
They were discussed during the meeting above, back in early 2000's. As far as I know there has been nothing enacting them in to law, so in effect they are only guidelines (though the HASC recommendations usually carry a fair amount of weight)

 
Back
Top