I'm in the process of building both L119a1 and a2 rifles, currently using existing krytac receiver/gearboxes. (1 aeg, 1 hpa swappable uppers/lowers)
To take them to the next level in terms of aesthetics would be receiver trades, but the only blank aeg receiver I can find in stock overseas is a cyma m4 (M058).
Obvious choice would be a cyma shell but I was considering a lonex/RA shell or even the full lonex gearbox as a base. Not sure how it compares to the nautilus.
Does anyone know which gearbox shells are compatible with a CYMA receiver (M058) krytac/lonex/RA etc, or is the stock shell a safer choice?
Having sold most of my AEG's in favour of HPA I only intend on keeping 1 m4 aeg for milsims, as such there is no budget on the gearbox build, I just don't want to run into any incompatibility or reliability issues.
Goal is 370fps, normal rof nothing crazy, with reliability the most important attribute.
I did consider ngrs/systema/gbls as a base but non of those are going to allow a swappable hpa lower, not to mention I'd like to be able to tech/service the rifles myself.
To take them to the next level in terms of aesthetics would be receiver trades, but the only blank aeg receiver I can find in stock overseas is a cyma m4 (M058).
Obvious choice would be a cyma shell but I was considering a lonex/RA shell or even the full lonex gearbox as a base. Not sure how it compares to the nautilus.
Does anyone know which gearbox shells are compatible with a CYMA receiver (M058) krytac/lonex/RA etc, or is the stock shell a safer choice?
Having sold most of my AEG's in favour of HPA I only intend on keeping 1 m4 aeg for milsims, as such there is no budget on the gearbox build, I just don't want to run into any incompatibility or reliability issues.
Goal is 370fps, normal rof nothing crazy, with reliability the most important attribute.
I did consider ngrs/systema/gbls as a base but non of those are going to allow a swappable hpa lower, not to mention I'd like to be able to tech/service the rifles myself.