Recent content by Lozart

To be fair, if I was going to spend £5k on a monocle I'd want to be able to see everything! If you're up against someone who is taking it seriously enough to drop Gen 3 passive money, then yeah, you're probably on a hiding to nothing.

Technically, technically, they're not. 350 on 0.2 is 313-314 on a 0.25. Pointless but not technically the same. Technically.

310 on 0.25 is 1.12J, 350 on 0.2 is 1.14J so yes 350 on a 0.2g is higher than 310 on a 0.25 but whether or not it's any better is arguable. You say it's accurate and you're happy with the RoF so what are you trying to actually improve?

It came from here: https://www.rgwairsoft.com/shop/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=463 Flat rate shipping was an extra $5 so total £105 (£83 ish). Ordered on 11/03 so shipping is pretty decent too. Didn't get stung for duty or VAT but of course YMMV. I'll pop up a review once I've...

Well...it's here. Pretty nice actually. Came with a spare set of batteries and an Allen key, sun shroud and lens protector. Glass is nice and clear, dot is pretty crisp. I like, is nice.

I REALLY want to be the guy chronoing a briefcase.

That's not as easy as it sounds, plus I don't really want to do that.

They do, but the base is the same. Brilliant, thanks!

Basically the measurement in red here

I'm looking at using it back to front - the cantilever bit that should be the front will be at the back. I need to confirm the height above the rail 40mm from the front of the forward rail clamp. In use, it will be the distance between the two blue lines.

Possibly this one https://www.fontspace.com/mercusuar-thin-font-f94511 There's a free download for it on that page.

Sorry, that was a typo, should have been "gothic standard sans-serif"

There are a few digital NVGs now that have dual 850/940nm illuminators built in. Granted, not the one OP is asking about, but still.

Unless you go for a 940nm illuminator.