Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not in the UK mate. If someone run at you with an axe you're suppose to call 999 - knock him cold and you'll probably be share a cell!To me a mans home is his castle and if he has a family with young children in the house he should use reasonable force to defend it.
Breaking into someone's home isn't a clever idea.Posting about how you'd 'put down' a burglar with an airgun on a public forum is not a clever idea.
^this*snip*
I was a victim of a burglary a few years ago. My means of income was taken away from me. The scum was later caught, proven guilty, and laid off because he was young and unemployed (much like me, thanks to him). And he probably had a real good time spending the money. Moral: crime pays, -especially in the UK.Breaking into someone's home isn't a clever idea.
not a single penny.Did he really not have to pay any compensation? That really sucks.
That's a bit sexist, women can steal stuff too.Alright, but you'll be in jail with him if they can prove prior intent (which your posts help a great deal in doing).
Kurtz has explained it much better than I could though.
Hahahaha!Who says the burglar has to identify as a man or woman? I for one think pan-sexual burglars shouldn't be afraid to carry out their work in the face of such persecution.
Whilst I agree with that whole article I would just like to pick up on the 'you have to have been directly threatened with violence' part. I'm not going to try and correct you becuase it is partly true, more of a clarification I feel. You do not have to be 'directly threatened' as you say all you have todo is FEEL threatened. What I mean by that is that if someone says "I'm going to f***ing kill you" then advanced on you with one or more hands concealed you would be well within your rights to put them on their arse until you perceived they were no longer a threat. However they don't have to say the words, if someone is advancing on you and you feel threatened you can 'defend' yourself with 'necessary and proportiante' force. It does seem like a huge loophole because most people could claim self defence for any minor fight but most people don't know this part of the law, now where this loosely ties in with this thread [trying to stay on topic slightly :L] If someone breaks into your house and you end up face to face with them you can take them on first and still claim self defence but as you said don't go overboard and you should be fine legally. I have had to use this defence at work a few times [thankfully never in my home] and it has worked everytime so don't be afraid to defend yourself/property/family, altough it sometimes seems the legal system is against us law-abiding cittizens in these situations it can work in out favour*snip*
Totally agree with that first bit as well, you have to be very careful with the whole 'self defence' thing in the UKAgree good point, it doesn't have to be an actual threat, it could be you 'feeling' threatened, but unfortunately in these cases it's very easy to argue your interpretation as incorrect or biased by fear/panic/prejudice, and your response as disproportionate. I know in america you have to issue a verbal warning before performing any act of defence if you havent actually been attacked, not sure about uk, have watched more CSI than episodes of The Bill recently...
was it a him....I remember a story about a man in South Africa who heard a burglar in his bathroom and shot him...
I remember a story about a man in South Africa who heard a burglar in his bathroom and shot him...
Well, IIRC, it was actually a she and the home owner didn't have a leg to stand on...was it a him....![]()