Rogerborg
Supporters
- Aug 22, 2017
- 9,195
- 6,058
Via their Failbook account. Their Supreme Court's ruling on constitutional carry seems to have sent NYPD deranged.
Off topic because airsoft has apparently already long since fallen foul of their Antipodean antipathy to assault-style toys. I guess they already class those as air rifles, which they would be here too without our exception.
Note that they don't mention energy levels, or projectiles, just "spring-loaded air pump" = air rifle = weapon = summary execution by gunshot to the head (or similar).
What they apparently haven't noticed, but half the commentards have, is that Nerf uses a sprung piston, so should be equally as criminal. This ought to make for some interesting lawsuits.
It did prompt me to wonder what the UK situation is with gel blasters. They don't enjoy airsoft's S57A exemption because they're not "designed to discharge only a small plastic missile". So if they can auto anything - and as the kids say, if it seats, it yeets - at over 1J then they're lethal barrelled and get bumped to Section 5, right?
Unless they argue the apocryphal "frangible projectile" exemption for paintball markers that I've heard mooted but have never looked up.
At this point it's just a game of who's going to be triggered into banning what sort of trigger-related fun next.
Off topic because airsoft has apparently already long since fallen foul of their Antipodean antipathy to assault-style toys. I guess they already class those as air rifles, which they would be here too without our exception.
Note that they don't mention energy levels, or projectiles, just "spring-loaded air pump" = air rifle = weapon = summary execution by gunshot to the head (or similar).
What they apparently haven't noticed, but half the commentards have, is that Nerf uses a sprung piston, so should be equally as criminal. This ought to make for some interesting lawsuits.
It did prompt me to wonder what the UK situation is with gel blasters. They don't enjoy airsoft's S57A exemption because they're not "designed to discharge only a small plastic missile". So if they can auto anything - and as the kids say, if it seats, it yeets - at over 1J then they're lethal barrelled and get bumped to Section 5, right?
Unless they argue the apocryphal "frangible projectile" exemption for paintball markers that I've heard mooted but have never looked up.
At this point it's just a game of who's going to be triggered into banning what sort of trigger-related fun next.
Last edited by a moderator: