it's an idea i like, as you say problematic to enforce, but good in principle for changing up the game dynamic of a regular skirmish without necessarily screwing anyone over for not having things like low caps etc.
problem is, like most things in this sport, it's not the ones who are playing fairly and following the in-place rules that are the problem, so adding more rules won't necessarily fix it.
this is true, and a trap we've all fallen foul of at some point, even if you're usually an ok judge of things unless you actually see the rounds land then it always remains a possibility.
although that doesn't mean non-hit calling isn't a thing, it absolutely is ranging from legitimate no-feels (something no player is immune to, no matter how honest) to tunnel vision to just straight up plot armour.
Oh it most certainly is. I have given payers the benefit of the doubt told them they were hit and to respawn, I have made player remove plate carriers, I have put players out of a game after failing a test shot. But the major thing is perceived non hit taking is significantly more common than non hitting and people falsely calling non hit taking can ruin a games atmosphere more than a non hit taker. As soon as a player Call take your hit you hear players grumbling and suddenly every shot is landing on a non hit taker. You are faced with people deciding if they aren't taking their hits why should we?
