Tommikka

If an operable RIF is outside the definition of "airsoft gun" does it require a defence?

If an operable RIF is outside the definition of "airsoft gun" does it require a defence?

Speaking of single action and manufacturer semi auto airsoft guns only (and then only those designed to be within the PCA airsoft definition) which have hypothetically been modified for above 2.5J (the highest muzzle force permitted by PCA) at point of sale, which would enter the air gun/pistol/rifle category and become limited firearms.   Thus as firearms (speculatively unable to be classes as airsoft guns under that exception), their status as realistic imitations (since that VCRA de
I would go by the VCRA defining what a RIF is in comparison to an IF, but having no definition of what an “Imitation Firearm” is,   (Other than the greater than 50% of specified bright colours/transparency), and argue my case with the Firearms definitions of firearm and imitation firearm. The modified airsoft RIF example would initially not be a firearm under the Firearms airsoft paragraph and would be a realistic imitation under the VCRA definition. Once modified to exceed the power e