ICS M4 vs G&P M4

G&p..... by far.

Best externals without buying an ino or systema,

Internals are brilliant, demonic Rof

ICS also has issues in that it hardly takes any aftermarket parts.

 
If your budget allows it G&P, if it doesn't, G&G make a gun called the CQB-S essentially the same thing without aim point and G&P's outstanding externals and internals, it is a £100 cheaper though. It's your choice ICS make some good stuff but G&P is much superior :)

 
My site's hire guns are ICS M4s and I think they're really very very good, they outrange my MP5 and they're miles better than my gas M16. That said though, I've never used a G&P one, so I can't make any comparisons.

 
As an ICS owner I love the split gearbox which is an ICS feature. Found it very easy to work on my M4 v my TM MP5 so I would go ICS, but then again my mates both got ICS as well so we can swap mags and stuff easily.

Where I play everyone says G&G and looking spares / body kits, etc there certainly easier to find bits for. That said ICS stuff is out there as well :)

 
ics are easier to work on as it has a split gearbox.but g&p have better externals

 
And better internals tbh, its not a split gearbox but oracle internals are still better (imo)

I've had both and although the ICS was really good, it doesn't touch my g&p

 
G&P HANDS DOWN! :D

First gun! Must be excited!

I havent much experience as others on the forum (softing for less than a year)

I personally own a G&P M4 CQB/V.S.B.R (looks exactly like the one on the link)

i find G&P guns are reliable and they have never let me down.

But it depends on your budget i guess.

If its your first gun i would say go for the ICS.

 
almost every g&p m4 i heard about has had fixing, but ive heard little about people at the site i go to fixing their m4s and they use a lot of them.

 
Back
Top