• Hi Guest. Welcome to the new forums. All of your posts and personal messages have been migrated. Attachments (i.e. images) and The (Old) Classifieds have been wiped.

    The old forums will be available for a couple of weeks should you wish to grab old images or classifieds listings content. Go Here

    If you have any issues please post about them in the Forum Feedback thread: Go Here

Airsoft Forums UK

DX115FALCON
DX115FALCON
All done without any prior biases (eg: I wouldn't review BAW BBs because I use them all the time, but would get someone who hasn't used them before to)

Josh95
Josh95
sure, would be cool to see how different weights effect accuracy/range too

Airsoft_Mr B
Airsoft_Mr B
Good call I really like the idea of seeing comparisons between different weights as I've only ever used .2s

Brand not so much tbh as I and a few others just stick to one really (specifically Blasters)

unless it turns out through reviews that there really is an affordable priced alternative which is much better

DX115FALCON
DX115FALCON
It would be done in collaboration with the Fire Team DERP Facebook/YouTube page. We want to test out brands that are traditionally viewed as good- like Blasters and Madbull- to see if they really are "that good", as well as those viewed as bad to see if it's just a bias on a specific company or if the BBs really are low quality

S
Sitting Duck
Great idea, admit some guns prefer some brands over others but would be good to see. Also the weight factor would be also good to demonstrate how much better they maintain accuracy n flight etc....

Started to use .20's now just for chrono and using .25's and a few .28s soon

DX115FALCON
DX115FALCON
We would be keeping everything standard- probably .20s or .25s

S
Sitting Duck
Well it would be good to show the 0.25's at least coz I was quite impressed in the difference in reasonable setup. But totally understand it adds more stuff n crap to test and main purpose was to show quality bb's rather than weights.

Back
Top