nice, depends what you're using it for. Side arm; hmmm bit bulky.... CQB primary; nice.
-
Hi Guest. Welcome to the new forums. All of your posts and personal messages have been migrated. Attachments (i.e. images) and The (Old) Classifieds have been wiped.
The old forums will be available for a couple of weeks should you wish to grab old images or classifieds listings content. Go Here
If you have any issues please post about them in the Forum Feedback thread: Go Here
Airsoft Forums UK
Russe11
Not a 'sensible' choice of guns. It's going to be hard to get mags and parts. The only reason anyone gets a gun like that is that they love it. The 'sensible' sub machine gun would be an MP5. But who wants to be sensible right? 
M_P
I like the look but they're too heavy, lots of weight up front and nothing to balance it out.
Frizzle- I dont think anyone would use it as a sidearm, it's a very large smg.
Frizzle- I dont think anyone would use it as a sidearm, it's a very large smg.
Russe11
I bet its lighter than my Sten
Airsoft_Mr B
Too expensive...personally don't think it looks as nice as people make out. It's quite cool and futuristic but as Russ said, not really practical. Unless you have a lot to spend I would rather get a good MP5 too.
two_zero
I cant see them being ergonomic.. like when running around with a m203 on your gun. never tried the kriss, but holding the m203 suck.
jcheeseright
need 3 hands to reload it.
M_P
Yeah you'd have thought having magpul involved in the designing process would have helped with ergonomics.
