• Hi Guest. Welcome to the new forums. All of your posts and personal messages have been migrated. Attachments (i.e. images) and The (Old) Classifieds have been wiped.

    The old forums will be available for a couple of weeks should you wish to grab old images or classifieds listings content. Go Here

    If you have any issues please post about them in the Forum Feedback thread: Go Here

AirsoftBuddy - find airsofters around you

If you're going to use HTML5 attributes, you might want to declare the doctype correctly ;)
Thanks for checking it. It started as html5 but that got lost somehow on the way. :)

Would make sense to have a on site private messaging system,
That would open a can of worms I really don't want. Not on a technical side, I have created a PM and a chat system before, but because of legal and moral problems. So I just decided that AirsoftBuddy will help airsofters to find eachother, but the communication will not be done through it. There are many better channels to do that: email, FB, etc. It would be a redundant thing to implement.

Could we have a key or different colour code or just fields to show players game of interest e.g. CQB, woodland, Milsim, etc
That's a good idea, cheers.

Showing sites is a much needed feature, I'll figure out a good way to do it.

Thanks everyone for your help with this.

 
Last night I tried to change my password from the forgotten pw link an the form kept stating that the two values were different. This worked today on the normal change password page but not sure if they're different - worth a check.

 
If you want site data I can provide you with our private api. It contains all the sites and their fields and stores. We have this similar project in build at the moment but are happy to let someone else do it. :D

 
I'm having problems when you click on someone just has loading symbol and does nothing and defo having site locations would be a sweet

 
Last night I tried to change my password from the forgotten pw link an the form kept stating that the two values were different. This worked today on the normal change password page but not sure if they're different - worth a check.
Same problem.

Looks like the password composition criteria has been changed overnight as an improvement or something - couldnt use old password ?

Tried changing password on one platform under the forgotten password route and it asked me for my old password before I could move on.

Just tried it again on another platform and its fine and was able to change password.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
People actually still use that?

Even Microsoft technically abandoned ie
No, IE 11 is still supported by Microsoft. They built edge browser based on the concepts google used in chrome..

 
Same problem.

Looks like the password composition criteria has been changed overnight as an improvement or something - couldnt use old password ?

Tried changing password on one platform under the forgotten password route and it asked me for my old password before I could move on.

Just tried it again on another platform and its fine and was able to change password.
I added some special characters to the ones that can be used in the passwords and maybe different browsers implement the validation check differently. What are the 2 browsers/OS-es you tried?

 
I added some special characters to the ones that can be used in the passwords and maybe different browsers implement the validation check differently. What are the 2 browsers/OS-es you tried?
Are you using HTML5 validation, Javascript or Post Request Validation? Because I dont see how browsers would impact that. HTML5 Validation work the same across all browsers.

If he used Tor then Javascript would be disabled so it wouldn't load js validation. If thats the case he will have a hard time loading your googlemaps embedded frame. :D

 
I'm having problems when you click on someone just has loading symbol and does nothing and defo having site locations would be a sweet
I had that only in UC browser on Android. I couldn't yet figure out the reason. What browser is yours?

I was hoping to see a pointer in the states... I am disappointed
UK only, sorry. :P

Are you using HTML5 validation, Javascript or Post Request Validation? Because I dont see how browsers would impact that. HTML5 Validation work the same across all browsers.

If he used Tor then Javascript would be disabled so it wouldn't load js validation. If thats the case he will have a hard time loading your googlemaps embedded frame. :D
HTML5, that's why this puzzles me.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
HTML5, that's why this puzzles me.
I looked at the html, it looks fine to me. You might want to add a info box telling people they need "Minimum 8, maximum 20 characters, a number is needed" the regexpress pattern looks fine, plus the label for="passwordConfimation" is wrong but that shouldnt effect the HTML5 validation.

 
No, IE 11 is still supported by Microsoft. They built edge browser based on the concepts google used in chrome..
Shame it's still a pile of poo. Yay MSFT.

Are you using HTML5 validation, Javascript or Post Request Validation? Because I dont see how browsers would impact that. HTML5 Validation work the same across all browsers.
Eh, no. HTML5 Validation should work the same across all supported browsers, but it has a tendency to throw discrepancies between Safari vs Chrome vs FF vs Opera, some regex doesn't work consistently in Opera for inexplicable reasons, some of the validation certain sub attributes hasn't worked since FF 47, Chrome just make things up as they go along. Safari have tonnes of stuff enabled that won't even make it to spec for at least 2Q's etc etc.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Eh, no. HTML5 Validation should work the same across all supported browsers, but it has a tendency to throw discrepancies between Safari vs Chrome vs FF vs Opera, some regex doesn't work consistently in Opera for inexplicable reasons, some of the validation certain sub attributes hasn't worked since FF 47, Chrome just make things up as they go along. Safari have tonnes of stuff enabled that won't even make it to spec for at least 2Q's etc etc.
Your correct but I did not want to go into to much detail since CORE-26329 was fixed but is not in stable, but in general its supported by all most modern browsers.

 
I added some special characters to the ones that can be used in the passwords and maybe different browsers implement the validation check differently. What are the 2 browsers/OS-es you tried?
Firefox on MS7 and Safari on iOS

 
It's a real nightmare to make sure stuff plays ball with anything below IE8-9 (even 10 has its quirks). The fact of the matter is that there are a very, very small amount of legitimate users who use such old browsers and on a project like this it's not worth the effort in most cases. Making a webpage truly backwards compatible with IE is a very significant undertaking - many issues can be fixed with separate rules, but most can't without breaking the overall appearance.

http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css3_browsersupport.asp

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top