Jump to content

What is the point of long rail systems?


Mantle
This thread is over three months old. Please be sure that your post is appropriate as it will revive this otherwise old (and possibly forgotten) topic.

Recommended Posts

Quite new to this so I am still just trying to figure a few things out.

Been seeing more and more of these super long rail systems in airsoft lately, usually for the AR type RIFs. What is the point of a rail system that extends all the way to the end of a 16" barrel, for example? No one seems to utilise the rail slots beyond about 6-7" and even then, it is usually just a foregrip and maybe a bipod (for those super cool M4 DMRs with a scope, KAC foregrip, Harris bipod, magwell grip and silencer).

 

Can someone enlighten me as to why so many people opt for them and utilise them like your average 7" KAC rail? It just seems like extra weight. Or is it just another attribute to looking cool with a full auto M4 DMR?

 

TIA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couple of reasons. Mostly the C clamping tier one operator grip everyone does. 

 

A long top rail rail is actually useful in real steel aplications. It allows you to add night vision devices in front of the daytime optic, as well as IR lasers, torches etc. You also have finer control on a bipod that’s further away from you. In airsoft this is less important. 

 

The way I look at it is, if I’m not adding a great deal of weight, there’s no reason to not have a rail an inch or 2 short of the barrel. the gun is that long anyway, may as well increase your options. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Supporters
58 minutes ago, Wo1f said:

Couple of reasons. Mostly the C clamping tier one operator grip everyone does. 

You left out a whole line from this comment , in between ‘clamping’ and ‘tier’ it should also say “all the wanna be” !

just thought I’d point it out 😇😈

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, it is essentially just for looks in airsoft? An inch or two of rail may not weigh much, but it will definitely add up if someone only uses max 7" of their rail but they have at least a 14" rail system  (basically twice the weight in rail)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I prefer a long rail. 😉

 

Mostly for looks, but in function, I'm terrible for hitting the end of long guns off walls/doors etc. A rail takes the brunt of it better than an out barrel I would think. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Supporters

Mate when you come down to it , basically EVERY THING in airsoft is just for looks bar the guts of your gun . We don’t NEED all the tac gear/camo/different types of guns , we could just use a single basic B.B. slinger that bares no resemblance to any commercially produced fire arm (like most  paint ball guns) but we want something that looks like the ‘superdooperM4AKof doom’ that we’ve always wanted to use but unfortunately as there’s no collapse of society or zombie apocalypse AND you can’t buy them over here Airsoft’s the nearest we’ll get ! 😉

 

8 minutes ago, Arwen said:

 I prefer a long rail. 😉

 

Ooohh err misses ! 😱

What are you insinuating? 😇

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Druid799 said:

You left out a whole line from this comment , in between ‘clamping’ and ‘tier’ it should also say “all the wanna be” !

just thought I’d point it out 😇😈

I thought that went without saying lol. It very rarely has a use, in airsoft or outside of it. It’s 10% preference 90% because Chris costa did it so it must be the way 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on preference. Where you grip it and how much you're trying to fit on. I run a 10" rail on mine and find that the torch gets in the way of my hand when I shoot off hand so I'm planning on changing to a 12". I agree that a lot of it is unnecessary weight, especially when it's picatinny so I prefer longer rails to be either keymod or m-lok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Supporters
1 hour ago, Wo1f said:

I thought that went without saying lol. It very rarely has a use, in airsoft or outside of it. It’s 10% preference 90% because Chris costa did it so it must be the way 

A while ago I created an all mighty shit storm on a Murcan gun forum by saying it’s a crock of shit shooting style and quoted an article from a military web site that has a LOT of real SF guys on it that pooped it ! 😈 (personally don’t care what style people us)

i love Murcan’s there just SO easy to wind up ! 😂😂😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Supporters

I think it's down to several things:

1. It allows everyone to be able to use whichever 'grip' of the rifle the like from supporting arm outstretched to closer 'normal' holds

2. It protects the barrel 

3. Forward mounted torches and lighting won't reflect off the side of the barrel so much

4. Looks cool and doesn't add much weight anyway

 

Really this is a thread that CKinnerley will be able to answer better than anyone 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Supporters
2 hours ago, Druid799 said:

Mate when you come down to it , basically EVERY THING in airsoft is just for looks bar the guts of your gun . We don’t NEED all the tac gear/camo/different types of guns , we could just use a single basic B.B. slinger that bares no resemblance to any commercially produced fire arm (like most  paint ball guns) but we want something that looks like the ‘superdooperM4AKof doom’ that we’ve always wanted to use but unfortunately as there’s no collapse of society or zombie apocalypse AND you can’t buy them over here Airsoft’s the nearest we’ll get ! 😉

 

 

nail on head, if we wanted ultra lightweight performance we'd all be running firehawks or something.

 

airsoft is a fantasy, and within that fantasy we can do what we like.

 

hell, take my mg42, it doesn't do anything an arp9 with a drum mag can't do but it weighs about 5 times as much as the arp. thing is, it's still an awesome gun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In real firearm applications, there are a number of benefits - if you’re using iron sights, you can place the front sight further down the end of the barrel. But, if you have a freefloat barrel, then the bonus is sort of redundant anyway. It does act as a sort of protection to stop you knocking your barrel against things, but then again it’s bulkier so you could catch your handguard one more objects too.

 

I’m perfectly happy with my standard M4 quad rail handguard since I always have a vertical grip anyway, and 99% of long handguards in Airsoft is tacticool compensating for other departments which may be lacking.

 

A longer handguard can be very useful for CQB however, since you can mount a weapon light down the end of the rail and avoid that barrel-silhouette you get with shorter handguards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Supporters
6 hours ago, Mantle said:

So, it is essentially just for looks in airsoft? An inch or two of rail may not weigh much, but it will definitely add up if someone only uses max 7" of their rail but they have at least a 14" rail system  (basically twice the weight in rail)

To be honest unless you're using an old style rail like an S-system or something the weight really isn't that much, certainly not something that will make a huge difference or make you struggle.

Modern equipment is designed to be lighter in weight anyway.

Personally unless I'm going for a specific look I'll get the longest rail possible (within reason). Just go with what you're comfortable with

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Supporters

Where to fucking begin...

 

Anyone who says 'last couple of years' has either been living under a rock or is only aware of airsoft trends because forends that extend right to the base of the muzzle device have been a thing in US civilian shooting for many, many years now.  As with a ton of things we see now, it was spawned from competitive shooting, because they're the guys pushing the envelope who really, really want to shoot faster and more accurately than the next guy to run a given stage.  More accurate shots on target in less time = more money in the bank and trophies etc etc, same as winning in any sport.  So that's where it comes from, but the US Army has realised that the concept is the right one, their dedicated marksmanship unit utilise 'long rails' (which are just standard rails if you actually want an effective rifle) and the latest generation AR for various parts of US SF includes the Geissele URG-I upper, which looks like this:

 

Geissele_08-160_2_zpsyva5tfzq.jpg

 

And I promise the guys using those guns are 10-100x better at any shooting discipline than anybody here.

 

Fact is however you can play airsoft while holding on to your barrel, not like it gets hot, but I've literally never seen anyone do that because we all find some sort of handguard more comfortable.  Which style you choose matters naught and the ignorance in this thread is pretty rife, but as I say none of it 'matters' in bbwrz so I'll speak to actual firearms.

 

Grip and recoil control

A rifle is like piping icing or fighting a fire; you want control then you grip that thing as close to the end as possible, this is utterly basic physics.  It is a compromise in comfort and endurance, and the older style of traditional grips generally make more sense the longer range you're shooting, which is a result of the fact that military doctrine used to be all about shooting as far as physically possible.  You look at firearms design and usage doctrine from the late 1800s through to today, you see moves from .50+ cal muskets to .40+ cal black powder cartridge guns, then 30 cal bolt actions, then 30 cal (but shorter cases) in semi auto, then longer rifles (M16) in .22 and finally to today where the carbine is king.  Shorter and shorter ranges, smaller and smaller cartridges and progressively more of them.  Gone are volley sights for 1200m+, en masse firing and single shots, we want large magazines, red dot sights and short barrels to clear buildings and maybe shoot to about 3-400m (in terms of the individual rifle).  The next move is polymer/bimetal cases to make ammo even lighter, maybe step up slightly in calibre but that's a long debate.  But the point is Close Quarter Battle is the focus and the fastest shooting technique when you're in close is some type of extended grip.

 

Accessory placement

Increasing sight radius for irons is a factor, but irons are basically dead in western military and competition usage.  Even in the pistol realm the US Army has adopted the P320 with the option to mount red dot optics and they are waaaaaay easier to shoot than irons on a handgun, it's like turning on easy mode.  But for lights and lasers, the closer to your muzzle they are the less splash you might get on to your barrel, which will both potentially highlight your presence to the enemy as well as decreasing effectiveness of that light/beam.  Particularly when so much fighting is undertaken at night to make the best of the technology edge our guys have, an effective IR laser is truly paramount.  Under night vision even the optics are a secondary let alone irons, aiming is mostly done by laser.  Since you're already holding the rifle close to the muzzle for optimal control, the laser now wants to be in front of your hand to prevent splash when shooting from either shoulder and the likes of the old 7" KAC RAS simply do have have the real estate for your hand (from either shoulder), your IR unit, white light and any pressure switches; not to mention perhaps bi-pods and foregrips.  If you're seeing people using long rails but only attaching stuff/gripping right back near the receiver, all that means is they're not utilising the rail properly... or it's bbs so it doesn't matter.  The people doing real shit however, do make very extensive use of all that rail space.

 

Personally I shoot airsoft guns the exact same as I shoot real ones, I also set things up in ways that are very much well proven by better shooters and also ergonomic and make sense to my mind.  Seeing as inner barrel length make so little difference in our low power smooth bores I much prefer shorter barreled guns which translates to only having perhaps a 9-10" handguard.  That gives an extra bit of space to both grip the gun from either shoulder and mount both a light and pressure pad along the 12 o/clock rail.  There's also the capacity to add a PEQ/DBAL/MAWL in to the mix down the line for any event when I'm using my own NV.  Extension of the arm compared to 'traditional' technique and equipment is not changed significantly since the rail is only a couple of inches longer.  I'm also pretty OCD about checking the weights of any forend (+mounting hardware) I buy and I have a couple in magnesium/aluminium alloy which extend to the end of a 14.5" barrel yet weight far less than a 7" KAC RAS.

 

Costa has been irrelevant in tacticool culture for easily 3-5+ years now and he turned some silly shit up to 11 that created some un-evidenced bias about certain ideas amongst closed minded people.  There is also massive part of this discussion entirely missing which is the difference between free-floated barrels/handguards in the real world and ones that do not freefloat, not to mention the huge differences in quad rails and KeyMod/M-LOK but the latter should be entirely self explanatory if you've ever spent any time looking at pictures of guns; real or fake.

 

As I've said in a dozen threads here already, if you're genuinely getting a red face and a throbbing forehead vein over "why do people do XYZ???" you need to just stop and realise we're all playing a stupid kids game and literally none of it matters.  Nothing anyone else does necessitates copying, we can all use an inner barrel as a BB blow pipe or a replica Proton pack with an HPA system and lead weights inside if we like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/17/2018 at 2:46 PM, CKinnerley said:

Where to fucking begin...

 

we can all use an inner barrel as a BB blow pipe or a replica Proton pack with an HPA system and lead weights inside if we like.

 

@L3wisD can make us all the loadouts needed :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...