Monk

Excellent recommendation Sir!!. Just put the Tokyo Marui High Cycle in youtube and I love that, it's also compact too. Hmmmmm.

Hello again gents and ladies, I'm after more brain picking if that is okay. I received my UKARA the other day. Drooling for a day or so whilst checking out the many, many, many options available to me now. However, there is a snag now. I spent the 3 game days running around with hired rifles (all M4 variants, long barrel). The last game day, I was given an M4 with 355fps and 2 mags. One mag containing .20 and the other with .25's. The rifle gave up after about 300 rounds were put down and I obviously had to trade back in. What I did notice was how the FPS, the long barrel and players unsure of calling hits, made it just as useless as the guy operating it. The rounds went down range just fine (mostly curving off right), but long distance... maybe 30 meters or just under, was just shocking. I had better accuracy with the .20's. So, I decided when the UKARA came through to use an SMG as a primary. An SMG with mid range and a high rate of fire. I'm not sure how different shops work, though I'm interested in test firing the 2 or 3 that I narrow down. So far, I've looked at and held an MP7 (or SMG8)?, a UMP45 and I decided to hold the P90. I like the P90, having held it again a second time. The first time, I held it and pretty much dismissed it as too small. I loved the feel of the MP7 but it happens to be a GBB and I hear fully gassed mags for this weapon, out the box, will fire the first mag and only just manage the reload. Opinions vary obviously. The ump45 didn't really feel right and that happened to be the SMG I was looking to buy. So, with all of the useless drivel above, I'm in need of opinions and thoughts on; 1) High rate of fire 2) Mid range 3) Upgradable internals 4) SMG 5) Sturdy and robust or reliability. I'm sure a HROF doesn't mix well with reliability out the box, but I'm desperate for recommendations. Thank you all

Thank you all for the replies. I'm seeing a few repeated over and overso I may well go with one of those brands. I just need to decide now which gun layout I prefer. I'm liking the look of the longer G36C? With bipod but the only ones I've seen are made by a company a lot of you don't recommend. I use to dream of the P90 but after holding one, it's way to small for me and my body type. My secondary may very well be a subby like a mac 10 lookalike a UMP45 or just a pistol. Best to concentrate on a primary first I guess. Cheers chaps

Thank you very much for the reply

I expect you are right. It's just, in my mind, even if you have a player with verbal diarrhea, responding with a physical attack is still the worse of the two issues. I suppose though that they were free to game elsewhere and the ban only applied to that site.

Personally I think banning the victim was a bit much. That's like walking down the street, having some random guy smash your face in, in front of police and you end up arrested and charged with the guy that attacked you. Obviously that's an extreme and daft analogy, but it still within the point. Though I suppose the victim was banned because he provoked the physical attack by not calling his hit or holding his hands up.

Morning you lovely people. So, 3rd game is set for 2 weeks and I've taken the time to space my 3 games over 5 months. It's woodland style and I prefer woodland to close quarter building games, though the site has several small compounds. I've chose to rent for these 3 games and have used their m4a1's. I've been to The Grange shop and spoken with a very polite lad called Ben. He allowed me to have a look and feel of some of their guns and I plan to give him/the grange, my custom for buying. Now, the problem I have is not wishing to buy an inferior brand. You know, the type that appear breakable, chew up internals after 3+ skirmish games and are usually avoided by seasoned players. I really want AEG but not, forgive me, a Chinese replica type that will fall apart. Which brands do you all swear by or have had issues with?. Obviously if it infringes on naming and shaming companies, then don't name the bad ones, just throw names of good ones at my head. Thank you of reading and any advice. Monk.