Jump to content

[Resolved]


Sacarathe
This thread is over three months old. Please be sure that your post is appropriate as it will revive this otherwise old (and possibly forgotten) topic.

Recommended Posts

The whole point of the Airsoft section of this bill is to exempt airsoft replicas from firearms legislation

 

 

 

Amended clause 111 of the Policing and Crime Bill 2015-16

(5) After section 57 insert—

“57A Exception for airsoft guns

(1) An “airsoft gun” is not to be regarded as a firearm for the purposes of this Act.

(2) An “airsoft gun” is a barrelled weapon of any description which—

(a) Is designed to discharge only a small plastic missile (whether or not it is also capable of discharging any other kind of missile),

and

( B) is not capable of discharging a missile (of any kind) with kinetic energy at the muzzle of the weapon that exceeds the permitted level.

(3) “Small plastic missile” means a missile that—

(a) is made wholly or partly from plastics, and

(aa) is spherical, and

( B) does not exceed 8 millimetres in diameter.

(4) The permitted kinetic energy level is—

(a) in the case of a weapon “is capable of discharging two or more missiles without repeated pressure on the trigger, 1.3 joules;

( B) in any other case, 2.5 joules.”

 

This is what's tripping me up, this act means the firearms act 1968?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what UKAPU have been lobbying for, i personally think the limits for 'lethality' are a little low but at least we do now have a clearly defined legal limit for an Airsoft gun.

 

It all makes sense now, I've never seen clause 111 of the bill so I was missing the context, I always thought "(5) After section 57 insert—" referred to the PC bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...